Bill Analyses and Ratings

Bill Information: H0413 – State employee reduction, travel

Session: 2025 Regular Session

Rating: +1

Bill Summary:

House Bill 413 enacts two major reforms aimed at eliminating government waste and improving fiscal accountability. The first provision, known as the Idaho Personnel Reduction Act, requires every state agency receiving legislative appropriations to identify all full-time equivalent (FTP) positions that have been vacant for more than 180 days at the close of each fiscal year. Unless the agency can fully fund and justify retaining the position, it must be eliminated from the agency’s annual budget request. Agencies must submit a report detailing the position title, duration of vacancy, reason for the vacancy, and whether the position will be retained or removed.

The second provision requires every agency to submit a detailed report of travel-related expenditures from the previous fiscal year as part of the annual budget process. This includes expenses for airfare, lodging, meals, mileage, conference fees, purpose of travel, travel dates, and whether any third-party reimbursements were received. These measures are designed to identify inefficiencies and ensure greater transparency in how taxpayer funds are spent. The bill includes an emergency clause and becomes effective immediately upon passage.

Reason for Rating:

House Bill 413 strongly aligns with the Idaho Republican Party Platform’s commitment to shrinking government, eliminating wasteful spending, and enforcing transparent, responsible use of taxpayer dollars. By requiring agencies to eliminate long-vacant positions and report detailed travel expenditures, the bill increases public accountability and discourages bureaucratic bloat. It does not expand government authority or create new regulations—rather, it streamlines existing processes and reinforces the Legislature’s role in holding agencies accountable. For these reasons, H0413 is rated +1.

Rating: 1

Rating Breakdown

Overall Rating (1)

Legacy rating from 2025 analysis