Bill Analyses and Ratings

Bill Information: SR113 – Resolution Condemning Political Violence

Session: 2026 Regular Session
Status: In Committee
Last Action: Filed in Office of Secretary of Senate (Feb 9, 2026)

Bill Summary

Senate Resolution 113 is a non-binding statement from the Idaho Senate condemning political violence and honoring victims of such violence. The resolution references specific recent incidents, including the murder of political activist Charles “Charlie” James Kirk at Utah Valley University and the murder of Minnesota State Representative Melissa Hortman and her husband. It acknowledges that Idaho law enforcement, first responders, public servants, and elected officials face targeted attacks that erode civility and create barriers between citizens and government.

The resolution commends law enforcement and emergency personnel for their efforts in investigating these crimes and bringing suspects to justice. It calls upon all Idahoans, regardless of background, party affiliation, or creed, to reject political violence, recommit to respectful debate, uphold American values, and respect one another as fellow Americans. As a resolution rather than legislation, it creates no new laws, appropriates no funds, and imposes no requirements on citizens or government entities.

Overall Assessment

This resolution promotes civil political discourse by condemning violence against public officials and political activists. It benefits law enforcement and public servants by formally recognizing the threats they face and honoring their work to address political violence. The resolution encourages all Idahoans to engage in respectful political debate without fear of violence or retribution.

Rating: 2

Rating Breakdown

ARTICLE I. RESPONSIBILITY IN GOVERNMENT (0)

This resolution makes no provisions regarding fiscal responsibility, taxation, government spending, or legislative operations. It is a symbolic statement condemning political violence without addressing any budgetary or governmental reform matters.

ARTICLE II. CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT IN GOVERNMENT (1)

The resolution directly promotes citizen involvement by affirming "the foundation of a free and civil society is the ability to engage in open and respectful political discourse without fear of violence or retribution." It calls upon all Idahoans "to reject all forms of political violence, to recommit to respectful debate" and to respect one another as fellow Americans, which encourages civil participation in government.

ARTICLE III. EDUCATION (0)

The resolution contains no provisions related to education policy, curriculum, parental rights, school choice, or educational institutions at any level. While it references a murder at Utah Valley University, this is merely identifying the location of an incident rather than addressing educational policy.

ARTICLE IV. AGRICULTURE (0)

The resolution does not address agriculture, farming, ranching, agricultural markets, or any related topics.

ARTICLE V. WATER (0)

The resolution contains no provisions regarding water rights, water management, dams, or any water-related policy matters.

ARTICLE VI. NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT (0)

The resolution does not address natural resources, environmental policy, land use, wilderness areas, or any related environmental topics.

ARTICLE VII. ENERGY (0)

The resolution contains no provisions related to energy policy, energy independence, hydroelectric power, nuclear energy, or electrical rates.

ARTICLE VIII. IDAHO NATIONAL LABORATORIES (0)

The resolution does not mention the Idaho National Laboratory, nuclear research, or any related research and development activities.

ARTICLE IX. PRIVATE PROPERTY RIGHTS (0)

The resolution does not address private property rights, eminent domain, just compensation, or property development regulations.

ARTICLE X. STATE AND FEDERAL LANDS (0)

The resolution contains no provisions regarding state or federal land management, land ownership, or related policy matters.

ARTICLE XI. WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT (0)

The resolution does not address wildlife management, hunting, fishing, predator control, or any related topics.

ARTICLE XII. ECONOMY (0)

The resolution does not address economic policy, commerce, industry, small business, labor, or transportation matters.

ARTICLE XIII. HEALTH AND WELFARE (0)

The resolution contains no provisions related to healthcare, health insurance, patient rights, welfare programs, or related health and welfare topics.

ARTICLE XIV. AMERICAN FAMILY (0)

The resolution does not address family values, marriage, right to life, parental rights, or other family-related policy matters. While it mentions victims and their families, this is incidental to its focus on political violence rather than family policy.

ARTICLE XV. OLDER AMERICANS (0)

The resolution does not address policies affecting older Americans, retirement, or related topics.

ARTICLE XVI. LAW AND ORDER WITH JUSTICE (1)

The resolution directly supports law and order by condemning "all forms of political violence" and commending "the dedicated law enforcement and emergency personnel for their tireless efforts in finding the suspects responsible and the courts involved for bringing swift legal justice." It acknowledges that Idaho law enforcement and public servants face targeted attacks and honors their work to maintain public safety.

ARTICLE XVII. NATIONAL DEFENSE – SECURING THE BORDER (0)

The resolution does not address national defense, military policy, veterans, border security, or terrorism. While it condemns violence, this is in the context of domestic political violence rather than national security threats.

ARTICLE XVIII. ELECTION OF JUDGES AND IDAHO SUPREME COURT JUSTICES (0)

The resolution does not address judicial elections, judicial selection processes, or constitutional interpretation by courts.

ARTICLE XIX. RELIGIOUS LIBERTY (0)

The resolution does not address religious freedom, free exercise of religion, or the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. While it mentions "creed" when calling for unity among Idahoans, this is a general reference to inclusivity rather than a substantive religious liberty provision.